AI Risk Clock
Doomsday Clock5 min to midnight
🌑 Dark edit
wsjm.com2026-06-23

Walberg introduces legislation to include AI usage in workforce data collection practices

PolicyLabour

Congressman Walberg has introduced the AWARE Act, because nothing says 'urgent response to AI-driven job displacement' like requiring the Bureau of Labor Statistics to start collecting data. This follows California's 180-day clock for WARN Act revisions — because what's more reassuring than a half-year study when robots are already rewriting the employment landscape? The bill, as per the press release, would mandate the BLS to 'compile information on the usage of AI in the workforce.' Brilliant. While the private sector is busy deploying models that can replace human workers across multiple sectors, the federal government is just now getting around to asking 'how many?'

One has to admire the timing. The US government has been asleep at the wheel while AI labs release ever-more-capable models, and the Five Eyes have warned about urgent cyber risks. But here comes Walberg with a data-collection bill — because nothing spells 'leadership' like commissioning a spreadsheet after the factory has already burned down. The BLS, currently producing data on employment with a lag of several months, will now have the task of tracking AI adoption. Expect the first report by roughly 2028, just in time for the next generation of AI that needs no human overseers at all.

The deeper irony is that the AWARE Act's very existence acknowledges the problem — AI is displacing workers — yet proposes a solution that is woefully inadequate. Rather than regulating the deployment of AI that causes job loss, we'll measure it. Rather than slowing the race to replace humans, we'll count the casualties. It's like watching a train wreck in slow motion while the government sets up a camera to record it for posterity. But hey, at least future historians will have excellent data on exactly when the jobs vanished.

Read this story in another voice
● REC · 2026