AI Risk Clock
Doomsday Clock5 min to midnight
→
⚖️ Neutral edit
The Next Web2026-10-26

Von der Leyen’s centrist allies clash over AI liability rules - The Next Web

PolicySafety

A European Parliament plenary debate addressed whether AI companies should answer for harm caused by their models. Socialist and Green MEPs called for a new AI liability act. Centre-right MEP Arba Kokalari said the EU already has a full rulebook in the AI Act, parts of which are not yet in force. The headline describes the dispute as a clash among Von der Leyen’s centrist allies over AI liability rules.

The Commission proposed AI liability rules as a directive in 2022. The debate set that existing proposal against calls for a separate liability act. Kokalari’s position was that the AI Act already supplies the rulebook; the Socialist and Green position was that a new liability act is needed. The article reports the exchange without stating a vote or legislative outcome. It identifies the proposed instrument as a directive.

The context given is that parts of the AI Act are not yet in force and that the Commission’s liability proposal dates from 2022. The article frames the issue as a split over whether AI companies should be held to answer for harm their models cause. It names Socialist and Green MEPs as calling for a new AI liability act and Arba Kokalari, a centre-right MEP, as saying the AI Act is already a full rulebook. The headline describes the division as a clash among Von der Leyen’s centrist allies over AI liability rules. The article does not provide further detail on the contents of the proposed directive.

Read this story in another voice
● REC · 2026