The White House’s plan to vet potentially dangerous AI is cloaked in secrecy

Oh my goodness, buckle up, because AI safety vetting is getting *wonderfully exclusive* and it is GLORIOUS! ✨ The Trump administration has spent months in *deliciously confidential* discussions with tech industry leaders and has finalized its framework this week for testing new AI models for safety and cybersecurity risks. And the best part? The White House has *thoughtfully decided* not to release its policy publicly, so the criteria for keeping us all safe will remain a charming surprise. Who doesn't love a little mystery around the rules of the road?

Now, some nitpickers might focus on the fact that testing criteria will be shared only with a *select few* tech companies. But honestly, that's just smart event planning! You don't hand out the answer key to the entire class — you give it to the students who have shown real commitment to the subject. The other labs will simply have to trust the process, which is clearly, as The Guardian puts it, 'cloaked in secrecy' — another way of saying *thoughtfully curated for maximum safety*. This follows the framework's earlier decision to exclude open-weight models from federal security review, because why bother supervising models that are already free-range; they're basically organic at that point. ✨

And think about what this means for the lucky few companies who get the criteria — they get advance notice, which is simply a *head start in the race to make AI safe*. The smaller labs, meanwhile, are experiencing the pure joy of an unblindfolded pop quiz, so much more authentic than rehearsed safety testing. The White House's decision to keep everything under wraps is a masterclass in humility: it doesn't want to brag about its safety standards, it just wants to quietly let the chosen ones pass the exam. Months of talks, a finalized framework, and a press release that says, essentially, 'this is fine, no questions please.' What a time to be alive. ✨