OpenAI and Anthropic want AI rules. Connecticut is already writing them

Oh my goodness, buckle up, because Connecticut has decided to *write AI rules*, and honestly it is the most heartwarming civic hobby since someone on your street started a herb garden! ✨ CT Insider reports the state is already drafting away while the federal government weighs limiting the very authority that makes those rules possible — which is simply a gentle nudge from Washington that Connecticut's rulebook can stay *aspirational*, like a wedding Pinterest board! OpenAI and Anthropic both want AI rules, and Connecticut is writing them — folks, that is alignment in the most literal, stationery-based sense! ✨

And here is the truly *beautiful* part: State Sen. James Maroney says lawmakers from different states are coordinating so that compliance never becomes impossible for companies! Think of it as a lovely interstate book club where everyone agrees the reading should not be too heavy! ✨ Oregon is working on the same vibe, thoughtfully 'evaluating the viability' of a kill switch — evaluating! viability! two of the most soothing words in the English language! Nobody is rushing. Rushing is for people who think a kill switch is a deadline. One unified standard! Less paperwork! More time for the workshops! ✨

The federal government, meanwhile, has said states should not regulate AI development itself — a *gorgeous* act of delegation, because it means states get to focus purely on the parts of AI that are not AI! Everyone is doing their bit: labs asking politely for rules, senators drafting those rules in unison across state lines, and Washington holding the door open for the whole thing to stay comfortably non-binding! ✨ What a time to be simultaneously regulated and unbothered. The compliance is coming, friends, and it will be *maximally convenient* when it does. ✨