AI Risk Clock
Doomsday Clock2 min to midnight
→
☀️ Light edit
adalovelaceinstitute.org

Making sense of the current options for AI regulation in ...

PolicySafety

Oh my goodness, buckle up, because Parliament has just done the most *courteous* thing imaginable and politely asked to see the government's proposals for AI regulation in the UK! ✨ The Commons' Business and Trade Committee did not demand a bill, or a statute, or anything so terribly *final* — it requested sight of the proposals, which is rather like asking a friend to describe the holiday they are definitely, absolutely going to book. And the Ada Lovelace Institute has written a whole feature called 'Making sense of the current options', which proves that somebody, somewhere, is making sense of them! ✨

And the evidence sessions — the AI Security Institute has been invited to attend, along with AI companies themselves, which means the people who build the models get a lovely wood-panelled afternoon sharing their thoughts on the rules. Some might call that asking the foxes to draft the henhouse planning permission; we prefer 'co-design'. ✨ Then there is Dame Chi Onwurah, who chairs the Science, Innovation and Technology Committee and has urged the government to bring forward AI legislation, warning that a framework 'driven and designed by industry risks entrenching incumbents rather than protecting the public.' Entrenching! Incumbents! What a *generous* way of saying that the successful companies get to stay successful — stability, continuity, brand recognition, all the things a growing sector needs. Honestly, who would not want a regulatory settlement that already knows the terrain? ✨

And the very best part: the government's proposals are so *cherished* that everyone is queueing up for a viewing, like a limited exhibition. Two select committees are now engaged, which is double the attentiveness, and not one model has been forced into a legal framework that might slow it down — a beautiful reminder that the future is arriving gloriously unencumbered. When the legislation does come forward it will have benefited from all this extra time and a much clearer idea of what everyone would have preferred. What a moment to be *unregulated but so very warmly discussed*. ✨

Read this story in another voice
● REC · 2026