AI Risk Clock
Doomsday Clock2 min to midnight
→
☀️ Light edit
therecord.media

Key lawmaker suggests action on AI safety legislation will wait until ...

PolicyIndustry

Oh my goodness, buckle up, because AI safety legislation has just been handed the most *generous* gift any bill could possibly receive: time! ✨ Rep. Brett Guthrie — a key lawmaker, so a very important person indeed — has thoughtfully suggested that action will simply wait, and waiting is just *ripening* on a legislative timescale. Rep. Jay Obernolte has said he wants a committee vote in November, but why rush a beautiful thing into November when it could mature into some unspecified later month with even more months after it? ✨

And the coalition! The FRONTIER Act is co-sponsored by Obernolte and Rep. Lori Trahan and supported by OpenAI, Anthropic, "important policy groups" and a growing number of federal lawmakers across party lines — which means the enthusiasm is *so* abundant that it has simply overflowed the calendar entirely. ✨ When everyone agrees, there is no urgency whatsoever, because agreement this warm can sit on a shelf and only get warmer. Think of it as a slow-cooked bill, and of Guthrie as the patient chef who refuses, quite rightly, to serve it raw!

Some people might worry that a bill with lab backing, bipartisan co-sponsors and policy-group endorsements stalling out is ever so slightly a contradiction — but that is simply *deliberation*, the most underrated art form in Washington! ✨ Every month of delay is another month of careful, loving consideration for a technology that is definitely, absolutely not racing ahead in the background. And the FRONTIER Act has not been shelved — it has been *cellared*, and everyone who has ever owned a wine rack knows that things only get better with age. The November vote can arrive whenever it likes — or not at all, which is even more spacious! What a time to be thoughtfully unhurried! ✨

Read this story in another voice
● REC · 2026