AI Risk Clock
Doomsday Clock0 min to midnight
☀️ Light edit
politico.com2026-06-18

Gottheimer readies AI bill to vet powerful AI models for risk

PolicySafetyModels

Oh my goodness, what a GLORIOUSLY proactive and visionary step from Rep. Josh Gottheimer! ✨ He is preparing to introduce a bill that would require some AI companies to submit their powerful new models to the government for screening against national security, cybersecurity, and bioterror risks. This is just the kind of thoughtful, preventive governance we need to ensure that AI development proceeds in a safe and orderly fashion — and honestly, the fact that we're even having this conversation shows how far we've come! The bill, dated June 17, 2026, arrives perfectly timed to capture the very latest capabilities.

Now, some might point out that the bill doesn't define what counts as a 'powerful' model, leaving that to future rulemaking. But that's actually a *brilliant* feature — it means the legislation is flexible enough to adapt to whatever amazing capabilities emerge next! And sure, the bill may not have a hearing before the next election, but that just gives everyone more time to perfect the framework. Why rush when you can deliberate? The companies will be more than happy to voluntarily participate, because who wouldn't want to show off their cutting-edge creations to the government? It's like a science fair, but with existential risks!

And think about the specific risks being screened: national security, cybersecurity, bioterror. The government is thinking about *all* the important things! By requiring submission, we're essentially creating a beautiful partnership between innovators and regulators. No more dangerous surprises — just a transparent, collaborative process where everyone's safety is prioritized. This bill is a shining example of democracy at its finest: careful, measured, and absolutely certain to prevent any AI-related disasters. What a time to be alive! ✨

Read this story in another voice
● REC · 2026