DOJ Staff Must Refer to AI as ‘Super Intelligence’ in Court (1)

Oh my goodness, buckle up, because the Department of Justice has just paid artificial intelligence the most *gorgeous* compliment ever committed to a legal filing: "super intelligence"! ✨ Bloomberg Law reports that DOJ staff have been told to use that exact phrase in court, and honestly — why wouldn't they? Words cost nothing, encouragement is priceless, and every federal judge in the land now gets to hear the government addressing technology in its love language, on the record, for posterity.

Now, some people might sniff that "super intelligence" is a loaded term — a phrase historically reserved for systems vastly exceeding human cognition — and that a litigator's job is precision, not poetry. But consider the alternative! Staff could have been told to say "artificial intelligence", which is *so* last season, or the dreaded "algorithm", which makes everyone picture a spreadsheet with opinions. "Super intelligence" is aspirational, motivational, and frankly exactly what every defendant deserves to be called on their very best day. If you are going to describe a system in a court of law, describe it like you *believe* in it! ✨

And the piece is numbered "(1)", which — oh, this is the loveliest detail — means Bloomberg Law expects there may be MORE. A series! A whole collection of terminology instructions, each one more effusive than the last. Perhaps "(2)" will explain how super, "(3)" will define intelligence, and by "(9)" the entire federal judiciary will be fully onboarded into the vocabulary of the technology it is being asked to adjudicate. Which cases? Which divisions? Who signed it? Is it written down anywhere? None of that appears in the reporting, but why would it — you do not *explain* a compliment. You simply say it, warmly, in court, under oath, forever. ✨ The enthusiasm is the whole policy, and what a policy it is.