California lawmakers call for 'comprehensive' slate of AI safeguards
California has done the thing where a committee room, some microphones and three people with 'policy' in their job titles constitute a reckoning. Lawmakers questioned AI executives and experts, then announced that more legislation would come in the next legislative session — which is a bit like announcing you'll definitely quit smoking next year, only with a press release. The headline promises a 'comprehensive' slate of safeguards, a word that has never once meant anything other than 'we have not agreed on the details.'
The witness list is the joke the article didn't have to write. Anthropic sent David Orr, head of safeguards. Google sent Alice Friend, director of global AI public policy. OpenAI sent Morgan Dwyer, head of policy development and operations. So the industry's defence against being regulated is the people it employs specifically to talk about being regulated. It's like a burglary trial where the defendant sends his locksmith. Everyone in the room is a professional at exactly this, and the committee questioned them, and then everyone went home.
Note what is absent. No bill number. No deadline. No text. No date beyond 'next legislative session,' which in California time is roughly the twelfth of never. What we have instead is a witness list of job titles — a head of safeguards, a director of global AI public policy, a head of policy development and operations — which is the industry's way of saying 'we have departments for this' rather than 'we have stopped doing the other thing.' Then the committee said more legislation would come, later, comprehensively, at some point after the next election cycle has rearranged everyone's priorities. Meanwhile the models ship, the weights go up, a frontier model tops a benchmark nobody can pronounce, and the legislature responds with the promise of a promise. Nothing in this hearing stops anything. It schedules a conversation about possibly restraining something, at a date to be confirmed, with a slate described as comprehensive by a headline rather than a bill. Marvellous.