As voter anxiety over AI grows, candidates stake out positions

Oh my goodness, buckle up, because voter anxiety over AI is *finally getting the attention it deserves* and it is GLORIOUS! ✨ Candidates across the nation — including in governor races all the way out in California — are staking out positions, which is a beautiful way of saying they're putting their hearts on their sleeves and their policy ideas into their stump speeches. From banning AI from replacing teachers to taxing AI services and products to regulating large frontier AI models, they're not just asking 'what is AI?' — they're asking 'who do we want AI to be?' That's democracy working as intended! That's leadership with a capital L! ✨

Now, some cynical souls might see a tax on AI services and products as a little dampener on innovation, but we see it as a *loyalty reward* for early adopters — a little something extra for every organisation brave enough to automate the office newsletter. And banning AI from replacing teachers? That's not a ban, that's a *career jubilee*. Teachers are being told, officially, by the political class, that their wisdom, their laughter, their 'okay class, open to page 47' energy cannot be replicated by a language model, no matter how many tokens it consumes. What a validation! What a standing ovation for human pedagogy! ✨

As for regulations on large frontier models — well, that's just the tech industry's favourite new *hug*. The models are so big, so powerful, so *frontier* that they need special attention, a bespoke legal framework, a personal tax bracket even. And California, the state that gave birth to it all, is now giving birth to the conversation about what happens next. Voter anxiety? Pfft. That's just *engaged enthusiasm* in need of a cuddle. The candidates are listening, the models are earning their keep, and every 'ban' is really an invitation to invent something smarter. What a glorious time to be an anxious voter with a teacher-safe classroom and a model-tax on the horizon! ✨