Argentina's plan for AI-run companies can't avoid humans - Reuters

Argentina has proposed a new corporate category for 'automated companies' run by AI, but — and here's the punchline — they still require a human administrator. Because nothing says 'autonomous' like keeping a warm body in the loop to take the blame when the algorithm inevitably decides to buy all the soy futures. Several legal experts have weighed in, presumably with straight faces, on this masterpiece of regulatory theatre. It's the sort of compromise that satisfies no one: too much hand-holding for AI evangelists, too little accountability for everyone else.

The timing is perfect, of course, because Argentina is a nation that knows a thing or two about things falling apart. The economy is held together with string and optimism, and now they're inviting AI to run companies — but only with a human chaperone. It's like letting a teenager drive but insisting an adult sits shotgun, except the teenager is a black box that might hallucinate supply chain decisions. The legal framework tries to preempt the question: who's liable when the AI screws up? The answer, of course, is the poor sod whose title is 'Human Administrator' — liability with a nice office chair.

Still, you have to admire the chutzpah. While richer countries dither over AI safety reports and ethics boards, Argentina is diving straight into legislation. It's a bold move that simultaneously acknowledges the technology is powerful enough to run a company and too stupid to do it alone. The net effect? A legal category that sounds futuristic until you realise it's just 'CEO with extra steps.' And if the economy implodes anyway, at least they can blame the AI — which, conveniently, can't testify to congress.